<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/17367504?origin\x3dhttp://masterzhuo.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
Thursday, September 28, 2006
@10:36 AM

Anti-competitive mergers


This article appeared on the front page of The Business Times today. A short summary ~

Provisions under the Competition Act to prohibit anti-competitive mergers will come into force on July 1 next year - later than some had expected. In its current form, parties to the mergers can apply for the Competition Commission of Singapore (CCS) view on whether a merger is anti-competitive ONLY AFTER a merger has been completed. Then this spokeperson says that "feedback" from the industry suggests this should be extended to mergers that have not been completed, so firms considering a merger could check with the CCS whether it would fall foul of the rules.

This was one of the "feedbacks" that cause the delay in implementation of the new provision. I say they are crap in the first place. If they are practioners who use abit more brain, they will know that if they only express their views ONLY AFTER the merger, they are wasting everybody's time. It's like saying ~ "Here you go. Go and do it. I will tell you if you have crossed MY boundaries after you have done it".
Crap, how can a comission body be foolish enough to think of such policy in the first place? Can you imagine the uncertainty these firms will face? Not to mention the significant cost of unravelling a completed merger. I really felt disgusted when I learnt that policy makers have to waste time and money on deriving useless policies the first time round, before they have to waste time and money again to amend them. Crap ~

by Str|fe

0 comments

YYou are reading

Str|fe
@ www.masterzhuo.blogspot.com

Yhistory

October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007

SGBlog.com

sgBlogs.com